Space and time serve as foundational scaffolds for organizing visual working memory, enabling human observers to individuate, maintain, and select relevant visual objects in mind. An open question is whether an obligatory trade-off exists between these two dimensions—specifically, whether observers rely less on spatial organization when memoranda can alternatively or additionally be individuated in time. Here we tracked the use of spatial organization implicitly by measuring directional biases in microsaccades following attentional cues directed toward visual working memory contents encoded either simultaneously or sequentially to the left and right of fixation. Across two experiments, we found that spatial gaze biases toward the memorized location of the cued item remained fully preserved both when participants could rely on temporal order in addition to space (Experiment 1) and when they had to rely on temporal order for item individuation (Experiment 2). Thus, we find no evidence for an obligatory trade-off between the use of space and time in working memory, demonstrating that space continues to serve as a fundamental organizational medium even when temporal scaffolding is concurrently engaged.